Cursor's been blowing up on socials the last few weeks, in no small part thanks to this video from Fay Robinett which has been viewed 2.5m times:
What can an 8-year-old build in 45 minutes with the assistance of AI?
— Ricky (@rickyrobinett) August 19, 2024
My daughter has been learning to code with @cursor_ai and it's mind-blowing🤯
Here are highlights from her second coding session. In 45 minutes she built a chatbot powered by @CloudflareDev Workers AI 👀 pic.twitter.com/MJ6vAlmvnj
In a time when so many AI features/apps are falling short of the hype, what can you learn from Cursor to figure out which AI apps will win?
Three patterns:
1. They brought the LLM closer to where the user already works and closer to their data (the codebase, which is used as context).
2. There's a validity-check: does your code run (or tests pass)? If not add the stack trace back into the chat, and the LLM fixes it. This combats hallucinations.
3. There's a human in the loop. Automation usecases are underpeforming. Augmentation use cases are going great.
Full video:
And in tweet form:
Three patterns to learn from Cursor's popularity to help you think about which AI apps will win.
— Greg Baugues (@greggyb) September 6, 2024
1. They brought the LLM closer to where the user already works and closer to their data (the codebase, which is used as context).
2. There's a validity-check: does your code run… pic.twitter.com/tAt9vQe7GP
3 things to learn from Cursor's popularity
Three patterns you can learn from Cursor to figure out which AI apps will win